Ministerial meetings: the latest guidance on how departments should publish vital transparency data

An image of the spreadsheet template for UK government departments on publishing data about ministerial meetings
Meet sheet: the template for publishing ministerial meetings data
  • The Covid guidance says ‘Remote formal meetings using conferencing technology are assumed to have taken the place of in-person meetings’. Unless they are taking the place of a meeting, departments would not normally be required to record audio calls, in line with previous guidance (leaving ‘unsolicited or informal’ calls outside scope). The main guidance says that only meetings with media proprietors, editors and senior executives should be declared regardless of whether they took place in an ‘official, political or social’ capacity. This leaves some grey areas when it comes to lobbyists and other figures who are not related to the media. And it prompts questions as to exactly what communications with ministers we think should be declared in the WhatsApp age, and with the migration of meetings online during the pandemic blurring some distinctions between what counts as a meeting and what doesn’t — does the medium matter if the interaction could influence government policy?
  • The publication guidance and spreadsheet template are a useful attempt to standardize how departments publish this data, and to give practical advice on implementing high-level policy. But the published data can still sometimes be more difficult to digest than it should be. Some further tweaks to the guidance — for example, in how departments record names of ministers and officials (maybe a dropdown list to avoid typos and errors) or how meetings with multiple attendees are logged (say, a row per entity with a new column allowing for a consistent meeting description, allowing the different organisations at that meeting to be linked) — could be helpful.
  • There’s nothing in the documents released that couldn’t be published as a matter of course. The publication of high level guidance for publishing ‘transparency data’ on GOV.UK was a step forward in helping civil servants to publish and those of us on the outside to scrutinize (even if it can’t always be enforced). Why not publish this more detailed guidance too?

--

--

--

Freelance, gavinfreeguard.com. All things (usually government) data. Dataviz etc newsletter at twitter.com/WarningGraphicC.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

The Department of Justice’s Role in Combatting Nation State Threats

#randoms

Russia Isn’t Winning The War and It Isn’t Too Big To Fail

The New Pessimism of U.S. Strategy towards China

The Week in Public Services: 10th September 2020

The Muslim Brotherhood is dragging Tunisia into a mess in Libya

Moving towards more sustainable procurement through Youth empowerment initiatives

This War Has Two Side, Part 2

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Gavin Freeguard

Gavin Freeguard

Freelance, gavinfreeguard.com. All things (usually government) data. Dataviz etc newsletter at twitter.com/WarningGraphicC.

More from Medium

Effective Teamwork for Non-hierarchical Organizations

Foxglove joins the ROS Technical Steering Committee

Biomorphic and Organic shapes in Sculpture.

In memory of Jim Turner, attorney, consumer advocate and champion in the fight against chemical…